top of page

Zoning, Taxes, & the Fight for Montana’s Future

Courtenay Sprunger

Updated: 1 day ago

In the last census, Kalispell was named the fastest growing micro-metropolitan area in the country. And with that growth comes a real challenge: how do we make room for more families, more workers, and more opportunity without losing the very character that makes our communities feel like home?


This session, the Legislature is working through that question—trying to strike a balance between making housing more accessible and protecting the values that make Montana the Last Best Place. From zoning reform to infrastructure upgrades and property tax relief, here’s a look at some of the major proposals shaping the conversation this week.


Senate Bill 266, sponsored by Sen. Trebas would allow triplexes and four plexes in areas zoned for single-family homes in cities over 5,000 residents. It bars stricter rules on these units than those applied to single-family or duplex homes but allows limits where infrastructure can't support added density. In Kalispell, opponents worry SB 266 threatens neighborhood character, reduces local input, and strains infrastructure; others welcome more options for seniors, families, and workers seeking housing in walkable neighborhoods.


Senate Bill 243, carried by Sen. Boldman, would prevent cities from limiting building height below six stories in certain zones and require one off-street, ADA-accessible parking space per unit. Supporters say it removes costly barriers to housing development. Opponents worry it could allow tall buildings near quiet neighborhoods and prefer local control over zoning. In Kalispell, many provisions already align with existing downtown rules. A proposed amendment creating “transition zones” between taller buildings and single-family homes may offer a compromise between statewide housing goals and neighborhood character.


As Montana grows, we need tools to manage housing demand through local control, which is why I introduced House Bill 534. HB 534 provides an optional tool for county water/sewer districts—at their discretion—to sell advance system capacity to approved projects. This creates a self-funded path for necessary expansion without passing costs onto existing ratepayers. While entirely voluntary, this approach gives districts the flexibility to support housing where appropriate, reduce reliance on septic systems, and better protect long-term water quality—especially in areas experiencing growth.


Property Tax Reform: Relief Now and Planning Ahead

Property taxes share the stage as a top concern in the housing discussion. In addition to HB 321 Homestead Act (Jones) HB 483 The Right Back Act (Sprunger) covered prior, the following are key initiatives to watch.


HB 528 from Representative Byrne would roll property tax rates back to 2021 levels and extend relief to agricultural land. Supporters say it offers immediate relief to most property owners—helping fix a problem that began when rate adjustments were skipped in past sessions. Opponents are concerned about the trade-off: a significant drop in state revenue – estimated at approximately $200 million annually - that could impact public services.


SB 117, sponsored by Sen. Zolnikov, takes a longer-term view. It would allow local governments to set up a “Large Taxpayer Reserve Account,” saving 10 percent of newly taxable revenue each year. That reserve can be used to stabilize budgets if a major taxpayer—like a mine or manufacturing facility—shuts down or sees a large drop in value. To put it simply: if a small town relies on one large employer to fund services like police, roads, and fire protection, and that employer closes, everyone else could face a steep tax increase just to keep things running. SB 117 helps communities plan ahead so that doesn’t happen.


Together, these bills aim to make Montana’s property tax system more predictable, stable, fair.


Montana’s housing and tax challenges didn’t appear overnight—and won’t be solved overnight. But this session, we’re seeing thoughtful, bipartisan efforts to find balance: to support responsible growth, improve infrastructure, and protect the Montana way of life.


As a fifth-generation resident of the Flathead, I am working to create housing opportunities so that your children and grandchildren can build a life while ensuring that a decade from now, the place many of us have loved and lived for years is still recognizable.


Forever, Montana.




 

 
 
 

1 Comment


Connor Culver
Connor Culver
18 hours ago

I love the argument against HB 528: "Opponents are concerned about the trade-off: a significant drop in state revenue – estimated at approximately $200 million annually - that could impact public services." Montana had a $2 billion dollar tax revenue excess last time I checked. I think we can afford a loss of $200 million. I mean we could really afford $1 billion loss. These politicians are absolutely insufferable. It's ok that people are priced out of homes but god forbid the state loses a cent of tax revenue. Taxation is theft.

Edited
Like
C4K Logo 1.png

Paid for by Courtenay for Kalispell HD7 - R

PO Box 8315, Kalispell, Montana 59904

Justin Burt, Treasurer

406-407-1151

©2021-2024 Courtenay for Kalispell HD7.

bottom of page